DynaDish 5

RBDynaDishG-5HacD

DynaDish 5-1
DynaDish 5DynaDish 5DynaDish 5

مزایا

The DynaDish 5 is a new 802.11ac outdoor device with an integrated 25dBi antenna. Compact in it’s design, it is a simple and completely integrated product with everything you need to quickly install a reliable point to point link.

The DynaDish 5 is powered by a new 720MHz CPU from Qualcomm.

Product specifications

Details
Product code RBDynaDishG-5HacD
CPU nominal frequency 720 MHz
CPU core count 1
Size of RAM 128 MB
10/100/1000 Ethernet ports 1
Wireless chip model QCA9892
Wireless standards 802.11a/n/ac
PoE in 802.3af
Supported input voltage 11 V – 60 V
Voltage Monitor Yes
PCB temperature monitor Yes
Dimensions Ø 404mm, height 175mm (without mount)
Operating System RouterOS
Tested ambient temperature -40C to +70C
License level 3
Antenna gain DBI 25
CPU QCA9557
Max Power consumption 9W
Number of chains 2
Storage type FLASH
Storage size 16 MB

Wireless specifications

5 GHz
  Transmit power (dBm) Receive Sensitivity Transmit power (mW)
6MBit/s 31 -96 1259
54MBit/s 28 -81 631
MCS0 30 -96 1000
MCS7 27 -77 501
MCS9 22 -72 158

wireless parameters may be limited in software, depending on your local regulatory limitations

Gigabit PoE injector

24V 0.8A power adapter

U bolt kit

Dynadish mount

Ethernet test results

RBDynaDishG-5HacD QCA9557 1G all port test
Mode Configuration 1518 byte 512 byte 64 byte
kpps Mbps kpps Mbps kpps Mbps
Bridging none (fast path) 81.2 986.1 234.9 962.2 477.7 244.6
Bridging 25 bridge filter rules 81.2 986.1 118.4 485.0 119.5 61.2
Routing none (fast path) 81.2 986.1 234.9 962.2 408.2 209.0
Routing 25 simple queues 81.2 986.1 158.3 648.4 165.8 84.9
Routing 25 ip filter rules 64.8 786.9 70.4 288.4 60.9 31.2
  1. All tests are done with Xena Networks specialized test equipment (XenaBay),and done according to RFC2544 (Xena2544)
  2. Max throughput is determined with 30+ second attempts with 0,1% packet loss tolerance in 64, 512, 1518 byte packet sizes
  3. Values in Italic indicate that max throughput was reached without maxing out CPU, but because board interface configuration was maxed out
  4. Test results show device maximum performance, and are reached using mentioned hardware and software configuration, different configurations most likely will result in lower results